如何把学术论文写清楚
清楚的学术写作把简短主语紧挨真正的动词,再把新信息放在读者期待强调的位置。本页遵循 Publication Manual §§4.1–4.11 的 APA 7 学生论文清单(最后更新于 2021 年 9 月 8 日)、Turabian 的五条造句原则(Student’s Guide to Writing College Papers,第5版,第148页)、Nature Portfolio 的 “How to write your paper”、UNC 的 Word Choice、Style、Scientific Writing 与 Reorganizing Drafts 讲义,以及 Gopen 与 Swan 1990 年 American Scientist 论文 “The Science of Scientific Writing”。这是句子层面的改写。不是读者判断,不是语法错误地图,也不是主动与被动语态选择。
作者:CitationEasy Editorial Team阅读约 22 分钟

本页内容
简要答案:如何把学术论文写清楚
点出一个短而具体的主语,把真正的行动放进动词,并让二者紧挨着。先放熟悉信息,把新主张放在句末。同样精确时优先用日常词。术语或缩写第一次需要时再定义,随后复用那个精确用语。删掉 “it is important to note that” 这类空开场。只有当问题是谁执行动词时才指向语态指南;只有当句子确实不合语法时才指向语法错误。
改写模板(填入你的主张;不要编造数据)
先写主语+动词:
谁或什么做了什么。然后是限制、方法或例外。
行动在动词里:
不要写 “the implementation of X resulted in Y”,而要写 “X did Y”。
先熟后新:
旧信息在句首。发现、数字或主张在句末。
首次使用时给出术语:
全称(ABBR),随后用 ABBR。你随即定义的第一个关键术语用斜体(APA §6.22)。
删,不要装饰:
删除 “the fact that”、“it should be noted that” 和 “it is interesting that”(UNC Sciences)。留下剩下的分句。
美国心理学会在学生论文清单中重述了 Publication Manual(第 7 版)第 4 章。讲义标注 © 2021,最后更新于 2021 年 9 月 8 日。连贯性、简洁与清晰是三个分开的清单栏;行话那一句在各栏并不相同。
APA Style 学生论文清单,连贯性(Publication Manual §§4.1–4.3)
Check for continuity in words, concepts, and thematic development across the paper. Explain relationships between ideas clearly. Present ideas in a logical order. Use clear transitions to smoothly connect sentences, paragraphs, and ideas.
APA Style 学生论文清单,简洁(Publication Manual §§4.4–4.6)
Choose words and phrases carefully and deliberately. Eliminate wordiness, redundancy, evasiveness, circumlocution, overuse of the passive voice, and clumsy prose.
Do not use jargon, contractions, or colloquialisms.
Avoid overusing both short, simple sentences and long, involved sentences; instead, use varied sentence lengths.
Avoid both single-sentence paragraphs and paragraphs longer than one double-spaced page.
APA Style 学生论文清单,清晰(Publication Manual §§4.7–4.11)
Use clear and precise language. Use a professional tone and professional language.
Do not use jargon, contractions, colloquialisms, or creative literary devices.
Check for anthropomorphistic language (i.e., attributing human actions to inanimate objects or nonhuman animals).
Make logical comparisons using clear word choice and sentence structure.
本页用途
草稿语法正确但难以跟上时使用本指南:动词变成了名词,主语离行动有十二个词,本可用熟悉的词,或数字藏在 “various outcomes” 里。如何为读者而写决定解释多少。标题与小标题给各节命名。修改策略是草稿已存在之后的过程。学术论文格式是页边、扉页和字体。别把那些工作放在这个网址上。
下面每条完整例句都抄自我们打开过的页面。本指南较早版本里编造的识字项目统计、虚假的 “15% / 22%” 提升,以及虚构的期刊句子都已删除。2026-08-26 的更新还把 Gopen 与 Swan 的一个方案当成了他们的最终改写;本版印出已发表的第一句、他们的两次试改,以及他们真正敲定的段落。当某种模式有用但没有官方句子时,该行标为模板。
清晰是传达,不是装饰
George D. Gopen 与 Judith A. Swan 1990 年的 American Scientist 论文,至今仍是对这项工作最短的陈述。他们改写的是已发表的科学散文,不是为公众简化:
Gopen and Swan,“The Science of Scientific Writing”(1990)
We argue here that complexity of thought need not lead to impenetrability of expression.
The fundamental purpose of scientific discourse is not the mere presentation of information and thought, but rather its actual communication.
It does not matter how pleased an author might be to have converted all the right data into sentences and paragraphs; it matters only whether a large majority of the reading audience accurately perceives what the author had in mind.
UNC 的 Word Choice 与 Style 讲义,对想“听起来聪明”的学生说了同一件事:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”
But the most important goal of academic writing is not to sound smart—it is to communicate an argument or information clearly and convincingly.
Using simple words does not indicate simple thoughts.
In an academic argument paper, what makes the thesis and argument sophisticated are the connections presented in simple, clear language.
UNC Writing Center,“Style”
First, remember that your goal in academic writing is not to sound intelligent, but to get your intelligent point across.
选择精确的日常词
APA §§4.4–4.9 与 UNC 都拒绝注水。科学写作讲义补上学生常漏的精度门槛:只有在不丢掉技术区分时,才选熟悉的词。
UNC Writing Center,“Scientific Writing”
When given a choice between a familiar and a technical or obscure term, the more familiar term is preferable if it doesn’t reduce precision.
| 复杂 | 简单 |
|---|---|
| efficacious | effective |
| utilize | use |
| elucidate | explain |
| proximal | close |
UNC 自己的精度对照说明何时该用那个讲究的词。在方法或结果句中,correlated 是统计主张。Related 不是同义词:
UNC Sciences(官方对照)
精确:
population density is positively correlated with disease transmission rate
不够精确:
population density is positively related to disease transmission rate
用错日常词也是清晰失败。UNC Word Choice 的对照是官方的;两行都请保持英文:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”——误用词与多余含义
误用词:
Cree Indians were a monotonous culture until French and British settlers arrived.
改写:
Cree Indians were a homogenous culture.
多余含义:
I sprayed the ants in their private places.
改写:
I sprayed the ants in their hiding places.
为了显得有学问而存在的行话是清晰失败,不是学科要求。UNC 的 Word Choice 讲义给出对照:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”
行话:
The dialectical interface between neo-Platonists and anti-disestablishment Catholics offers an algorithm for deontological thought.
改写:
The dialogue between neo-Platonists and certain Catholic thinkers is a model for deontological thought.
作者从不定义的带倾向词,是同一问题放大到整篇论文。UNC Word Choice 的对照不让 society 做未经解释的工作:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”——带倾向的用语
带倾向:
Society teaches young girls that beauty is their most important quality. In order to prevent eating disorders and other health problems, we must change society.
点名:
Contemporary American popular media, like magazines and movies, teach young girls that beauty is their most important quality. In order to prevent eating disorders and other health problems, we must change the images and role models girls are offered.
先删冗词,再加强调
APA §4.5 点名敌人:冗长、重复、回避、迂回和笨拙的散文。UNC 的 Word Choice 表是该规则的学生版。这些替换来自 UNC,不是我们编的:
| 冗赘 | 简洁 |
|---|---|
| I came to the realization that | I realized that |
| She is of the opinion that | She thinks that |
| Concerning the matter of | About |
| During the course of | During |
| In the event that | If |
| In the process of | During, while |
| Regardless of the fact that | Although |
| Due to the fact that | Because |
| In all cases | Always |
| At that point in time | Then |
| Prior to | Before |
科学讲义还列出三个不提供信息的开场:“the fact that”、“it should be noted that” 和 “it is interesting that”。删掉它们。若剩下的分句不值得保留,这句话本就不该存在。
UNC 的 Style 讲义补上 Word Choice 未列表的三种冗长习惯:用套话顶替主张、一堆限定语,以及冗余成对。这些是 UNC 的官方例句:
UNC Writing Center,“Style”——套话、限定语、冗余成对
套话:
France bit off more than it could chew in Vietnam, and America’s intervention was too little, too late.
改写:
As the French faltered in Vietnam, even American intervention could not save the collapsing regime.
限定语堆叠:
Most people usually think that many puppies are generally pretty cute.
改写:
Most people think that puppies are cute.
冗余成对:
Adrienne fulfilled all our hopes and dreams when she saved the whole entire planet.
改写:
Adrienne fulfilled all our hopes when she saved the planet.
模糊限定就是 APA §4.5 要你删的回避。一个谨慎动词是学术。一堆 “might / possible / perhaps / some” 是作者躲开主张。因为没有官方手册印出这一对,所以这是模板:
模糊限定模板(不是官方例句)
回避:
或许有可能表明,这些变量之间也许会存在某种关系。
适度谨慎:
数据表明这些变量之间存在关系。
让主语紧挨动词
这是学生已经“用了简单词”之后还会撞上的失败。Gopen 与 Swan 的第一条读者预期,与 Turabian 的第二条原则,是同一规则。
Gopen and Swan(1990)
Readers expect a grammatical subject to be followed immediately by the verb.
Anything of length that intervenes between subject and verb is read as an interruption, and therefore as something of lesser importance.
Turabian, Student’s Guide to Writing College Papers,第5版,第148页(CMOS 专题页)
Make subjects short and concrete, ideally naming the character that performs the action expressed by the verb that follows.
Avoid interrupting the subject and verb with more than a word or two.
Put key actions in verbs, not in nouns.
Put information familiar to readers at the beginning of a sentence, new information at the end.
Avoid long introductory phrases: get to a short, familiar subject quickly.
Gopen 与 Swan 的第一个操作案例是已发表的线粒体遗传学句子。语法主语(The smallest)离动词(has been identified)有 23 个词。他们印出原文、两次试改,以及他们真正选定的段落。科学留下,打断不留。每一行都请保持英文:
Gopen and Swan——已发表的第一句及其改写
已发表原文:
The smallest of the URF's (URFA6L), a 207-nucleotide (nt) reading frame overlapping out of phase the NH2-terminal portion of the adenosinetriphosphatase (ATPase) subunit 6 gene has been identified as the animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit 8 gene.
若 207-nt 定义重要时的试改:
The smallest of the URF's is URFA6L, a 207-nucleotide (nt) reading frame overlapping out of phase the NH2-terminal portion of the adenosinetriphosphatase (ATPase) subunit 6 gene; it has been identified as the animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit 8 gene.
若该定义只是旁注时的试改:
The smallest of the URF's (URFA6L) has been identified as the animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit 8 gene.
他们敲定的段落(开头):
The smallest of the URF's, URFA6L, has been identified as the animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit 8 gene; but the functional significance of other URF's has been more elusive.
UNC Sciences 对方法句给出同样诊断。主语(the osmoregulatory organ)与行动(activates / expels)离得太远,三个动词说的是同一件事:
UNC Sciences(官方对照)
复杂:
The osmoregulatory organ, which is located at the base of the third dorsal spine on the outer margin of the terminal papillae and functions by expelling excess sodium ions, activates only under hypertonic conditions.
更清楚:
Located on the outer margin of the terminal papillae at the base of the third dorsal spine, the osmoregulatory organ expels excess sodium ions under hypertonic conditions.
一长串介词短语是同一结构问题。UNC Sciences 引用 Michael Alley 1996 年 The Craft of Scientific Writing 作为“不该怎么做”的例子——一句里有十一个介词:
UNC Sciences 引用 Alley(1996)
...to confirm the nature of electrical breakdown of nitrogen in uniform fields at relatively high pressures and interelectrode gaps that approach those obtained in engineering practice, prior to the determination of the processes that set the criterion for breakdown in the above-mentioned gases and mixtures in uniform and non-uniform fields of engineering significance.
UNC Style 的 Gilligan 句是该堆叠的学生版。圈出介词,再问“谁对谁做了什么?”:
UNC Writing Center,“Style”——介词堆叠
冗长:
The reason for the failure of the economic system of the island was the inability of Gilligan in finding adequate resources without incurring expenses at the hands of the headhunters on the other side of the island.
改写:
Gilligan hurt the economic system of the island because he couldn’t find adequate resources without angering the headhunters.
修饰语挂错名词,也是同一结构问题。UNC 的 Word Choice 讲义用这一对;这是悬垂修饰,不是词汇问题:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”
不清楚:
Having finished with studying, the pizza was quickly eaten.
清楚:
Having finished with studying, the students quickly ate the pizza.
先放熟悉信息,后放新信息
Gopen 与 Swan 把句首称作主题位置,把句末称作强调位置。Turabian 的第四条原则是同一规则的学生说法。这不是第二篇语态文章:蜜蜂/花粉那一对讲的是句子在讲谁的故事。
Gopen and Swan(1990)——主题位置
“Bees disperse pollen” and “Pollen is dispersed by bees” are two different but equally respectable sentences about the same facts. The first tells us something about bees; the second tells us something about pollen.
A sentence is too long when it has more viable candidates for stress positions than there are stress positions available.
他们用七条结构原则收束全文。没有一条是可读性公式的字数上限:
Gopen and Swan(1990)——七条原则
Follow a grammatical subject as soon as possible with its verb.
Place in the stress position the “new information” you want the reader to emphasize.
Place the person or thing whose “story” a sentence is telling at the beginning of the sentence, in the topic position.
Place appropriate “old information” (material already stated in the discourse) in the topic position for linkage backward and contextualization forward.
Articulate the action of every clause or sentence in its verb.
In general, provide context for your reader before asking that reader to consider anything new.
In general, try to ensure that the relative emphases of the substance coincide with the relative expectations for emphasis raised by the structure.
把行动放进动词
Turabian 的第三条原则——“Put key actions in verbs, not in nouns”——就是名词化规则。Gopen 与 Swan 的说法是 “Articulate the action of every clause or sentence in its verb。” UNC Style 的官方对照先把动词藏进名词,再把它放回去:
UNC Writing Center,“Style”——名词化与空开场
名词过重:
The discovery of the aliens was made by the government.
动词在前:
The government discovered the aliens.
空开场:
There is a need for further study of aliens.
改写:
We need to study aliens further.
弱动词:
The aliens have a positive effect on our ecosystem.
更强的动词:
The aliens improve our ecosystem.
APA §4.3 出于同一原因警告名词串:early childhood language intervention program evaluation protocol 逼读者拆堆。拆开:a protocol for evaluating an early-childhood language-intervention program。这次拆解是形态模板,不是关于真实方案的主张。
行话与缩写在首次使用时定义
APA §4.9 告诉你不要用行话;APA §§6.24–6.31 告诉你如何保留无法丢掉的缩写。Nature 的作者页写给职业科学家,却仍拒绝未经解释的缩略语。
APA Style 学生论文清单,缩写(Publication Manual §§6.24–6.31)
Use abbreviations sparingly and usually when they are familiar to readers, save considerable space, and appear at least three times in the paper.
Define abbreviations, including abbreviations for group authors, on first use.
APA Style 学生论文清单,斜体(Publication Manual §§6.22–6.23)
Use italics for the first use of key terms or phrases accompanied by a definition.
Nature Portfolio,“How to write your paper”
Keep technical terms to the places where they are needed. Define abbreviations at first use and use them sparingly.
Write clear and direct sentences. Using the active voice (‘we performed the experiment...’) typically helps readers better understand concepts and results described in a paper.
State the main finding clearly. A reader should be able to understand what you found and why it matters from the title and abstract.
Ask a colleague outside your immediate field to read the title and abstract.
UNC Sciences 比“定义一次”更严。只有当你会用到该术语不止一次时才用它。他们的例子是真正的区分,不是装饰:在持续比较病毒株的论文里,定义之后 enveloped 优于 “surrounded by a membrane”;一次性提及应留在日常词里。
要具体:数字胜过 “various outcomes”
APA §4.10(逻辑比较)与 UNC 科学讲义都拒绝漏掉对照一侧的比较,也拒绝在已有数量时仍用定性词。不要编造数字。使用 UNC 的官方对照,或带标签的模板:
UNC Sciences(官方对照)
定性:
development rate was fastest in the higher temperature treatment
定量:
development rate in the 30°C temperature treatment was ten percent faster than development rate in the 20°C temperature treatment
比喻:
experimental subjects were assaulted with a wall of sound
写明:
experimental subjects were presented with 20 second pulses of conspecific mating calls
逻辑比较需要把两项都写在纸上。APA §4.10 是 “more than” 与 “compared with” 背后的规则。这是形态模板,不是已发表结果:
逻辑比较模板(APA §4.10 形态)
不完整:
处理组被试得分更高。
完整:
处理组被试的得分高于对照组被试。
不要把人类动词交给研究
APA §4.11(拟人)是清晰规则,不是文体花样。理论不能下结论,论文不能相信,研究不能收集数据——作者才做了这些。清单用词是 “anthropomorphistic”;按印刷引用。下面一对遵循该形态;它不是已发表研究:
拟人模板(APA §4.11 形态;不是已发表研究)
研究当行动者:
该研究收集了 40 次访谈,并得出等待时间可预测爽约的结论。
研究者当行动者:
我们收集了 40 次访谈。等待时间预测了爽约。
语态是该诊断的另一半。清单说尽可能用主动语态,只有当行动的接受者应放在前面时才用被动,并告诉你对自己的工作使用第一人称:
APA Style 学生论文清单,代词(Publication Manual §§4.16–4.21)
Use first person pronouns to describe your work and your personal reactions (e.g., “I examined,” “I agreed with”), including your work with coauthors (e.g., “We conducted”).
包括 I 与 we 在内的那项决定,放在主动与被动语态。不要把本页写成第二篇语态文章。
让列表平行,让代词有着落
APA §§6.49–6.52 要求列表各项平行。清单的一行重述是官方的:
APA Style 学生论文清单,列表(Publication Manual §§6.49–6.52)
Ensure items in lists are parallel.
混杂列表即使每项都合语法,也是清晰问题。模板形态:
平行列表模板(APA §§6.49–6.52 形态)
不平行:
该研究考察了学生动机、他们的学业表现如何,以及他们的满意度。
平行:
该研究考察了学生动机、学业表现和满意度。
UNC 的 Word Choice 讲义把指代不清的代词当作选词失败。他们的例子是官方对照:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”
不清楚的 he / him:
My cousin Jake hugged my brother Trey, even though he didn’t like him very much.
点名:
My cousin Jake hugged my brother Trey, even though Jake doesn’t like Trey very much.
让论点句承载关键词
句子层面的清晰从主张开始。UNC 为真实作业文本——Mark Twain 的 Adventures of Huckleberry Finn——走了三稿论点。第 3 稿更强,是因为点出了关键词,不是因为词汇更花哨:
UNC Writing Center,“Word Choice”——Huckleberry Finn 论点
第 1 稿(含糊):
There are many important river and shore scenes in Huckleberry Finn.
第 2 稿(去向更清楚):
The contrasting river and shore scenes in Huckleberry Finn suggest a return to nature.
第 3 稿(主张里有关键词):
Through its contrasting river and shore scenes, Twain’s Huckleberry Finn suggests that to find the true expression of American democratic ideals, one must leave “civilized” society and go back to nature.
只有在你能点出关键词之后,再用论点句生成器来写或检验那一句。更长的过程见如何写论点句。
段落长度与过渡
APA §4.6 比“把段落写短”更具体。不要写一句一段,也不要让一段超过一页双倍行距。变换句子长度,而不是写满一页 40 词长句或一页 8 词短句。连贯性(§§4.1–4.3)是另一半:复用你刚定义的关键词,并写出关系(however、therefore、for example),而不是指望下一个标题替你做。
| 职责 | 常见信号 |
|---|---|
| 补充 | also, and, furthermore |
| 对照 | but, however, in contrast |
| 结果 | so, therefore, as a result |
| 举例 | for example, for instance, specifically |
| 顺序 | first, then, finally |
不另开指南的学科提示
规则不随学科改变。什么算精确的词会改变。
- 科学与医学。 UNC 科学讲义:量化,丢掉隐喻(“a wall of sound”),让主语与动词在一起。Nature 要求发现出现在标题与摘要里,默认主动语态,缩写定义一次。
- 社会与行为科学。 APA 第 4 章就是为你写的。留意拟人、对自己行动使用第一人称,以及逻辑比较。无偏见语言是第 5 章,不是清晰技巧。
- 人文学科。 UNC 的 Huckleberry Finn 论点是范本:在主张里点出关键词,然后一直用那些词。理论词汇只有在你会用到不止一次并在首次使用时定义时才允许。
如何抓住不清楚的句子
UNC 的 Word Choice、Style 与 Reorganizing Drafts 讲义,仍在教找出被埋动词的最快检查。
- 慢慢朗读草稿。 UNC Word Choice:若一句话对你或听者不通,就改写。卡顿是结构问题,不是“文风”。
- 起草后再做反向提纲。 UNC 的 Reorganizing Drafts 讲义:草稿存在之后,列出每段实际在做的事,再拿该清单对照论点。他们的 Huckleberry Finn 例子与 Word Choice 论点是同一主张。
- 问子领域之外的读者。 Nature 告诉作者,让紧邻领域之外的同事读标题与摘要。若该读者说不出你发现了什么,句子仍在呈现信息,而不是在传达。
- 扫每句开头的七八个词。 Turabian 的检查:短而具体的主语应已可见。若看不见,句子开始得太晚。
UNC Writing Center,“Reorganizing Drafts”
A “reverse” outline is one you make after you have written a draft.
The reverse outline will help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of both your organization and your argument.
清晰清单(APA §4 + Turabian + UNC + Gopen and Swan)
- 主语与动词相隔不超过一两个词
- 行动是动词,不是以 -tion 结尾的名词
- 熟悉信息在句首;新主张在句末
- 句子讲一个故事(主题位置),并强调一个新点
- 每个缩写与关键词都在首次使用时定义
- 只要精度还在,就用熟悉词替换讲究词
- 比较点出两侧;数量替换 “various” 与 “higher”
- 研究与理论不去收集、下结论或相信
- 列表平行;每个 they / this / it 只指向一个名词
- 没有一段是一句话;也没有一段长过一页双倍行距
- 朗读时草稿仍然说得通
相关指南
常见问题
- 怎样把学术论文写得更清楚?
- 把短而具体的主语紧挨命名真实行动的动词,再把新信息放在句末。APA 7 §§4.4–4.6 称之为简洁;Turabian 第148页与 Gopen 和 Swan 称之为满足读者预期。术语定义一次。删掉空开场。
- 学术写作里行话一定错吗?
- 不是。APA §4.9 与 Nature 拒绝的是未经解释的行话,不是学科词汇。UNC Sciences 说,当你会用到不止一次且更精确时,保留术语(用 correlated 而不是 related;用 enveloped 而不是 “surrounded by a membrane”)。首次使用时定义。
- 学术句子或段落该多长?
- APA §4.6 不定字数。它禁止只写短句或只写长句,禁止一句一段,也禁止超过一页双倍行距的段落。Gopen 与 Swan 补充:当值得强调的主张多于强调位置时,句子就太长。若一句需要两个想法,在第一个动词做完事后拆开。
- 为了写得更清楚,该用 I 或 we 吗?
- APA §§4.16–4.17 告诉你,对自己的行动用 I 或 we(“I examined”、“We conducted”),而不是 “the researcher” 或 “this paper”。那是语态与人称决定。使用主动与被动语态指南;不要在本页把行动者藏进名词化。
- APA Style 里的拟人是什么?
- APA §4.11:不要把人类行动交给无生命物体或非人动物。理论可以 address 一个问题,不能 conclude。研究不能 collect 访谈。点出研究者。官方清单把该形容词拼成 “anthropomorphistic”。
- 怎样改掉冗长的学术句子?
- 先删 UNC Word Choice 列表(“due to the fact that” → “because”;“at that point in time” → “then”)。再问 Turabian 的三项检查:主语短吗?行动是动词吗?新信息在句末吗?若还剩一堆模糊限定,只留一个谨慎动词。
- 什么是名词化,为什么损害清晰?
- 名词化是把行动停在名词里(implementation、improvement、discovery)。Turabian 第148页、Gopen 与 Swan,以及 UNC Style 都告诉你把该行动放回动词。UNC 的官方对照是 “The discovery of the aliens was made by the government” → “The government discovered the aliens”。
- 每个缩写都必须定义吗?
- APA §§6.24–6.31:在首次使用时定义缩写,而且通常仅当它至少出现三次并节省篇幅时才用。不要定义词典缩写(AIDS、IQ)或标准单位。Nature 补充:首次定义之后,你常常可以用代词,而不必在每句重复该缩略语。
- 主题位置与强调位置是什么?
- Gopen 与 Swan:开头几个词告诉读者这句话在讲谁的故事(“Bees disperse pollen” 讲蜜蜂;“Pollen is dispersed by bees” 讲花粉)。最后几个词接受强调。先放旧信息,后放新主张。那就是 Turabian 第四条原则的另一套说法。