跳转到正文
学术写作

如何为课程论文或研究论文写结论

结论是论文的最后一节,不是第二份摘要,也不是粘贴过来的论点句。UNC Writing Center说,它应综合你的思考,说明这些想法为何重要,并把读者推向对该对象的新看法。本页就是这份写法指南。它不是打开论文的如何写引言,也不是覆盖整篇草稿的如何写研究论文。

作者:阅读约 30 分钟

学术写作指南的配图
图片:Alexa Mazzarello,维基共享资源(CC0)
本页内容

简要回答:如何写结论

Harvard College Writing Center在每个学科都问同样三个问题:what(论文确立了什么),so what(那些利害为何仍然重要),now what(正文真正赢得的问题、应用或行动)。University of Toronto Writing Advice补上长度规则:多数论文用一段充分展开的段落;只有论文长到需要时,才用两三段。Purdue OWL补上学生实际会写的失败方式:不要发明新主张、新来源,或用最后一句去解决世界饥饿。也不要在最后一段发明统计数字。

起步模板(从你写过的论文填写;不要捏造证据)

课程论文 / 人文学科论文:

这样读来,是[证据之后重述的中心主张],而不仅仅是[题目]。它改变我们看待[文本、事件或论争]的方式,因为[正文赢得的 so what]。下一个问题是[在分析之前本无意义的问题]。

实证 / IMRaD论文(Discussion,不是第二份Results清单):

这些结果表明[一句话的发现],与[点名的既有研究]一致,与[该设计实际能检验的对立假设]不一致。主要局限是[会改变解释的那一项]。一项有用的后续研究应[能补上该缺口的设计]。

随机试验(CONSORT 2025 Items 29–30):

主要结果是[已在Results中的估计],与[点名的既有证据]一致,并不支持[该试验实际能检验的对立假设]。获益与伤害都重要,因为[数据实际显示的权衡]。主要限度是[会改变用法的偏倚、不精确或可推广性]。

政策或应用论文:

因为[论文中已有的证据],[谁]应当[发现所支持的具体行动],而不是[通常的替代方案]。维持现行做法不变,将[论文实际能辩护的后果]。

只用论点句生成器收紧你正要回扣的主张。然后用CitationEasy生成器引用真正支撑该主张的来源。

结论是做什么的——官方定义

五份写作页面描述同一份工作,并在复述可以走多远这一点上有用地分歧。UNC点出修辞工作,并把最后一段称为礼物。Toronto点出收束,再加上更宽的框架。Hamilton College的Nesbitt-Johnston Writing Center点出正当化:为什么这场论证值得做。Purdue Global Academic Success Center(2026年7月17日)点出最后印象:重述的主张、正文已经赢得的支撑,以及一个最终想法。Purdue OWL的论证论文页面重述更早的布道者格言——把你讲过的再讲一遍——然后立刻警告不要用“whiz bang”收束。没有一家把最后一段当作标题复述。本页不是如何写摘要:摘要是读者打开论文之前使用的独立概要。

UNC Writing Center,“Conclusions”

Your conclusion is your chance to have the last word on the subject. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts, to demonstrate the importance of your ideas, and to propel your reader to a new view of the subject.
Just as your introduction acts as a bridge that transports your readers from their own lives into the “place” of your analysis, your conclusion can provide a bridge to help your readers make the transition back to their daily lives.
Synthesize, don’t summarize. Include a brief summary of the paper’s main points, but don’t simply repeat things that were in your paper. Instead, show your reader how the points you made and the support and examples you used fit together. Pull it all together.
Your conclusion can go beyond the confines of the assignment. The conclusion pushes beyond the boundaries of the prompt and allows you to consider broader issues, make new connections, and elaborate on the significance of your findings.
Your conclusion should make your readers glad they read your paper. Your conclusion gives your reader something to take away that will help them see things differently or appreciate your topic in personally relevant ways. It can suggest broader implications that will not only interest your reader, but also enrich your reader’s life in some way. It is your gift to the reader.

University of Toronto Writing Advice,“Introductions and Conclusions”(Leora Freedman and Jerry Plotnick)

A strong conclusion will provide a sense of closure to the essay while again placing your concepts in a somewhat wider context. It will also, in some instances, add a stimulus to further thought.
A conclusion is not merely a summary of your points or a re-statement of your thesis. If you wish to summarize—and often you must—do so in fresh language. Remind the reader of how the evidence you’ve presented has contributed to your thesis.
A good last sentence leaves your reader with something to think about, a concept in some way illuminated by what you’ve written in the paper.

Hamilton College Writing Center,“Conclusions”

You might begin a conclusion by reminding the reader of your thesis and main points, but a conclusion is not a summary. A successful conclusion brings your argument to a logical close; it is where you justify your argument to the reader.
Use your conclusion to describe the consequences of your argument, to answer the question “why is my argument important?”
Do not begin with the unnecessary and over-worked phrase “in conclusion.”
Make a reasonable final claim; don't overstate your findings.
Take special care with your final sentence; make sure it is carefully constructed and leaves a strong impression.

Hamilton的写作过程样式表是9月那一页未加引用的遗留。它用一句话点出同一份工作,然后标出学生仍会键入的独断收束。

Hamilton College,“The Writing Process”(样式表)

Do not let your conclusion merely restate your introduction; if you have successfully argued your point, a summary conclusion generally bores and can even insult your reader.
Any paper that ends with such expressions as, “Thus it is unquestionably certain that...” probably expresses a dubious thesis.

Purdue OWL,“Conclusions”(论证论文)

Don't try to bring in new points or end with a whiz bang(!) conclusion or try to solve world hunger in the final sentence of your conclusion. Simplicity is best for a clear, convincing message.

布道者格言,步骤1(起步提纲,不是完成的收束):

Tell what you're going to tell them (introduction).

布道者格言,步骤2:

Tell them (body).

布道者格言,步骤3:

Tell them what you told them (conclusion).

用OWL的提纲检查最后一段是否仍属于这篇论文。然后做UNC更难的工作:综合,不要停在“把你讲过的再讲一遍”。只重复标题的复述,就是Hamilton所说的乏味总结,也是UNC的“That's My Story and I'm Sticking to It”。

课程论文结论对研究论文Discussion

最后一节的标题是体裁选择,不是同义词。课程论文通常以你可以称为结论的一节收尾。APA或Vancouver体例的实证文章通常以解释结果的Discussion收尾。不要把课程论文收束贴到实验报告上,也不要把细读论文变成带有你并未赢得的假“局限”段的IMRaD Discussion。APA的学生论文标题模板(2022年3月21日)用Method、Results和Discussion作为Level 1示例。有的教师仍要一个题为Conclusion的标题。遵循提示,而不是内部同义词。

课程论文 / 人文学科论文

  • 在证据之后,用新措辞回到论点
  • 综合读解或案例;不罗列正文标题
  • 可以把引言中的意象或问题收成闭环
  • 可以收在更锋利的问题,或对关键引文的重读上
  • 不倾倒未用过的档案发现(UNC的“Grab Bag”)

实证 / 医学 / APA论文

  • 对照假设或目的解释结果
  • 把发现放进已发表证据中,而不只放在你的样本里
  • 陈述会改变结果用法的局限
  • 点名数据所支持的后续研究或实践含义
  • 不重复Results节,也不发明经济主张

APA Style的Discussion Phrases Guide(第7版)把Discussion当作论文的收束节。9月那一页省略的遗留是第二条官方要点:在随笔和反应论文中,同一标题是概括关键主题并反思更广联系之处——不是重印Results之处。定量与定性报告细节见Publication Manual(第7版)§§3.8和3.16。APA的动词时态页(Publication Manual §4.12)比“整节Discussion都用现在时”更精确:已完成结果用过去时报告;含义、结论、局限和未来方向用现在时。

APA Style,Discussion Phrases Guide(第7版)

Papers usually end with a concluding section, often called the “Discussion.” The Discussion is your opportunity to evaluate and interpret the results of your study or paper, draw inferences and conclusions from it, and communicate its contributions to science and/or society. Use the present tense when writing the Discussion section.
In the Discussion section of a research paper, you should evaluate and interpret the implications of study results with respect to your original hypotheses. It is also where you can discuss your study’s importance, present its strengths and limitations, and propose new directions for future research.
In other types of papers, such as essays or reaction papers, the Discussion is where to summarize the key points or themes in your paper and reflect on previous statements and their broader connections.

连接发现的官方用语(填空;不要捏造研究):

This pattern of results is consistent with the previous literature … (citation).

局限的官方用语:

One limitation of this study is that … It is possible that ... Although the present research cannot rule out these explanations, it seems useful to point out issues that may conflict with these results.

APA Style,“Verb Tense”(Publication Manual §4.12)

报告结果(过去):

Results showed

含义(现在):

The results indicate

结论、局限、未来方向(现在):

We conclude
Limitations of the study are
Future research should explore

医学期刊遵循ICMJE Recommendations(2026年1月更新)。Discussion不是第二份Results倾倒,收束主张必须与数据相符。2026年1月文本还要求作者在那些变量重要处讨论性及/或性别。随机试验另有一份更窄的清单:CONSORT 2025 Item 29和30。The BMJ把该声明引作BMJ 2025;389:e081123(Hopewell et al.,2025年4月14日)。遗留的EQUATOR记录仍为同一文章ID印刷第388卷;用期刊引用,不要用那枚戳记。

ICMJE Recommendations,“Discussion”(2026年1月)

It is useful to begin the discussion by briefly summarizing the main findings, and explore possible mechanisms or explanations for these findings. Emphasize the new and important aspects of your study and put your findings in the context of the totality of the relevant evidence. State the limitations of your study, and explore the implications of your findings for future research and for clinical practice or policy.
Discuss the influence or association of variables, such as sex and/or gender, on your findings, where appropriate, and the limitations of the data. Do not repeat in detail data or other information given in other parts of the manuscript, such as in the Introduction or the Results section.
Link the conclusions with the goals of the study but avoid unqualified statements and conclusions not adequately supported by the data. In particular, distinguish between clinical and statistical significance, and avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless the manuscript includes the appropriate economic data and analyses. Avoid claiming priority or alluding to work that has not been completed. State new hypotheses when warranted, but label them clearly.

CONSORT 2025清单,Discussion条目(Hopewell et al.,BMJ 2025;389:e081123)

Item 29,Interpretation:

Interpretation consistent with results, balancing benefits and harms, and considering other relevant evidence

Item 30,Limitations:

Trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, imprecision, generalisability, and, if relevant, multiplicity of analyses

CONSORT 2025把旧的独立可推广性条目折进了Item 30。不要只因为CONSORT 2010有过,就另写一个“外部效度”标题。不要把Item 29当成许可,去发明试验并未测量的政策主张。只要稿件不含经济数据,ICMJE仍禁止经济结论。

Harvard的三步:What、So What、Now What

Harvard那一页是最短的工作方法。第一步是过渡,不是清单。第二步回到你在引言中点名的利害,再加以拓宽。第三步是读者能带出房间的那一句。Harvard说得很清楚:STEM论文常常收在后续研究问题上,而文学论文可以按论证重读中心文本中的一行。

Harvard College Writing Center,“Conclusions”

How you conclude your paper will depend on where you started—and where you traveled.
In a short paper—even a research paper—you don’t need to provide an exhaustive summary as part of your conclusion.
After the “what” and the “so what,” you should leave your reader with some final thoughts.
What can my readers now understand, see in a new light, or grapple with that they would not have understood in the same way before reading my paper?
What questions can I now raise that would not have made sense at the beginning of my paper? Questions for further research? Other ways that this topic could be approached?
fake transitions like “in conclusion” that are followed by sentences that aren’t actually conclusions. (“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)

Harvard的操作范例是Vanessa Roser关于ADHD与拒绝敏感(RS)的论文。记录页是现行Conclusions讲义(2026年10月19日打开)。Strategies for Essay Writing汇编(2024年3月)重印同一措辞;它不是第二份更新来源。那些句子是Roser的。它们不是可复制到无关题目上的模板。

Harvard的Vanessa Roser范例(ADHD与拒绝敏感)

论点(论文要表明的内容):

While socialization may indeed be an important factor in RS, I argue that individuals with ADHD may also possess a neurological predisposition to RS that is exacerbated by the differing executive and emotional regulation characteristic of ADHD.

结论回声(文献之后重述的what):

This literature demonstrates that, as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.

Now-what(过错与治疗):

seems to place a degree of fault on the individual. It implies that individuals with ADHD must have elicited such frequent or intense rejection by virtue of their inadequate social skills, erasing the possibility that they may simply possess a natural sensitivity to emotion.

Now-what(谁该在意):

has profound implications for understanding how individuals with ADHD might best be treated in educational settings, by counselors, family, peers, or even society as a whole.

注意Roser没有做的事。她不再罗列每一项研究。她不宣布“in conclusion”。她不为未读的论文道歉。她按文献重述主张,然后说明一套错误理论会让真实的人付出什么代价。那就是两步完成的so-what与now-what。

真正推动最后一段的UNC策略

修订时应保持打开的是UNC讲义。下面的策略是他们的。用一到两项。全部叠在一起,就会写出UNC所警告的杂物袋收尾。UNC的works consulted仍把Hamilton列成带遗留双斜杠(hamilton.edu//academics)的条目。现行Hamilton页是Writing Resources — Conclusions(单斜杠)。

玩“So What”游戏

UNC的诊断是对话,不是公式。每写完一句收束,就问“So what?”,再问“Why should anybody care?”。他们发表的例子用Frederick Douglass的Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself——讲义参考文献里列出的书,不是虚构案例。

UNC的Douglass“So What”对答

你:

Basically, I’m just saying that education was important to Douglass.

朋友:

So what?

你:

Well, it was important because it was a key to him feeling like a free and equal citizen.

朋友:

Why should anybody care?

你:

That’s important because plantation owners tried to keep slaves from being educated so that they could maintain control. When Douglass obtained an education, he undermined that control personally.

第一句是题目。最后一句是关于权力的主张。若草稿听起来仍像第一行,你还没有结论。你只有重述。

回到引言——然后改变它

UNC和Toronto都建议收成闭环:回到开头的场景、轶事或引文,但只在正文已经赢得新读法之后。Toronto的措辞是有用的约束:加上来自论文的进一步洞见,不要重放钩子。UNC指出,以Greensboro静坐开篇的论文,可以把该事件放进整个民权运动来收尾。论Virginia Woolf文体的论文,可以收在后来的作家或后来的女权主义者上。那些是UNC的例子,不是让你去发明静坐统计的提示。

提出一项行动、一项解决,或下一个问题

这是把Harvard的now what和UNC的“行动方针”合成一步。只有正文已经论证过该行动时才管用。文学论文很少需要政策建议。实验报告很少需要沉思。Hamilton补上对应警告:作出合理的最终主张;不要夸大发现。Hamilton还列出其他讲义只暗示的一步:在作业允许时提出限定或对立观点——qualification。

UNC Writing Center,应使用的策略

Return to the theme or themes in the introduction. This strategy brings the reader full circle. For example, if you begin by describing a scenario, you can end with the same scenario as proof that your essay is helpful in creating a new understanding.
Propose a course of action, a solution to an issue, or questions for further study. This can redirect your reader’s thought process and help them to apply your info and ideas to their own life or to see the broader implications.
Point to broader implications. For example, if your paper examines the Greensboro sit-ins or another event in the Civil Rights Movement, you could point out its impact on the Civil Rights Movement as a whole. A paper about the style of writer Virginia Woolf could point to her influence on other writers or on later feminists.

Toronto超越总结的七步

当最后一段准确但仍只是复述时,该用Toronto这份清单。这七步属于Freedman和Plotnick,标题是“How do I write an interesting, effective conclusion?”。挑选你的体裁已经赢得的那一步。9月的遗留把Toronto的政策简报句当作该清单的第八步。不是。它在下一标题下:“How does genre affect my introduction or conclusion?”。

University of Toronto,“How do I write an interesting, effective conclusion?”

If your essay deals with a contemporary problem, warn readers of the possible consequences of not attending to the problem.
Recommend a specific course of action.
Use an apt quotation or expert opinion to lend authority to the conclusion you have reached.
Give a startling statistic, fact, or visual image to drive home the ultimate point of your paper.
If your discipline encourages personal reflection, illustrate your concluding point with a relevant narrative drawn from your own life experiences.
Return to an anecdote, example, or quotation that you introduced in your introduction, but add further insight that derives from the body of your essay.
In a science or social science paper, mention worthwhile avenues for future research on your topic.

体裁会改变收尾——Toronto的遗留标题

Toronto在点名简报之前就警告:体裁会改变收尾。注释书目通常没有结论。书评可以以总体评价收尾。政策简报可以以建议收尾。遵循那种体裁,而不是上面的课程论文模板。

University of Toronto,“How does genre affect my introduction or conclusion?”

An annotated bibliography, for example, typically provides neither.
A book review may begin with a summary of the book and conclude with an overall assessment of it.
A policy briefing usually includes an introduction but may conclude with a series of recommendations.

不要做什么——UNC的回避清单与四种失败收尾

UNC的回避清单比笼统的“别无聊”更精确。Harvard的回避清单有重叠,并补上UNC只暗示的两种失败:你无法反驳的新反论,以及对你并未写的论文道歉。OWL补上世界饥饿收束。三份清单都保留;它们捕捉不同的失败。

UNC Writing Center,应避免的策略

Beginning with an unnecessary, overused phrase such as “in conclusion,” “in summary,” or “in closing.” Although these phrases can work in speeches, they come across as wooden and trite in writing.
Stating the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion.
Introducing a new idea or subtopic in your conclusion.
Ending with a rephrased thesis statement without any substantive changes.
Making sentimental, emotional appeals that are out of character with the rest of an analytical paper.
Including evidence (quotations, statistics, etc.) that should be in the body of the paper.

Harvard College Writing Center,应避免的内容

a complete restatement of all that you have said in your paper.
a substantial counterargument that you do not have space to refute; you should introduce counterarguments before your conclusion.
an apology for what you have not said. If you need to explain the scope of your paper, you should do this sooner—but don’t apologize for what you have not discussed in your paper.

UNC接着点名四种无效类型。例子是他们的,写的是Douglass。它们是不要写的内容。第一种是带演讲过渡的重述。第二种把论点藏到最后一行。第三种用颂词替换分析。第四种把未用过的研究偷运进收束。

UNC:四种无效结论(不要模仿)

“That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It”:

In conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery.

“Sherlock Holmes”(把论点留到最后):

So, as the evidence above demonstrates, Douglass saw education as a way to undermine the slaveholders’ power and also an important step toward freedom.

“America the Beautiful” / “I Am Woman” / “We Shall Overcome”:

Because of the efforts of fine Americans like Frederick Douglass, countless others have seen the shining beacon of light that is education. His example was a torch that lit the way for others. Frederick Douglass was truly an American hero.

“Grab Bag”:

In addition to being an educational pioneer, Frederick Douglass provides an interesting case study for masculinity in the American South. He also offers historians an interesting glimpse into slave resistance when he confronts Covey, the overseer. His relationships with female relatives reveal the importance of family in the slave community.

结论应该多长?

不要用博客上找到的百分比。Toronto才是你能向教师辩护的规则:

University of Toronto,长度

For most essays, one well-developed paragraph is sufficient for a conclusion. In some cases, a two-or-three paragraph conclusion may be appropriate. As with introductions, the length of the conclusion should reflect the length of the essay.

需要两页收束的五页细读是注水。五句话结束的学位论文章节是未完成。期刊文章因场地而异:有的科学快报把解释折进很短的末段;ICMJE原创研究使用完整Discussion;CONSORT 2025试验即使Discussion很短,仍须履行Item 29和30。在抄同学字数之前,先问作业、期刊或导师。

工作长度范围,不是规则。以作业确认为准。
体裁典型收束“完成”看起来像什么
短课程论文(约5–8页)一段(Toronto的默认)新措辞的论点、综合、一句so-what
长论文或章节两三段(Toronto)同样的工作,外加回到开头或下一个问题
APA / IMRaD文章Discussion节(APA 7 §§3.8、3.16;时态按§4.12)解释、证据语境、局限、后续研究
医学原创研究ICMJE Discussion(2026年1月)机制、证据总体、相关处的sex/gender、限度、实践或政策
随机试验CONSORT 2025 Items 29–30与伤害相平衡的解释;点名偏倚、不精确、可推广性的限度

已发表的学生结论——Hamilton College

Hamilton公布真实课程的样本结论,并得到Sarah Gould '05和Matthew Marks '05许可。保留措辞;不要把它们归到虚假引用下。Philosophy 110样本做的是so-what工作:它不复述Aquinas的证明,也不宣布上帝是大题目。它说明论证方法会付出什么代价。

Hamilton College,Philosophy 110样本结论

It is a natural, human inclination to wonder if God exists. Aquinas, like many other philosophers, attempted to prove God’s existence through logical reasoning. His arguments, however, seem to be based on the presumption that there is in fact a God. He went on from this supposition to question human concepts, such as the way that we determine what is good, true, and noble. If no obvious, tangible cause for a concept or behavior could be found, he concluded that God must be the cause and then claimed proof of God’s existence. Aquinas was clearly biased in his study of God; he seemed to have a firm belief that God exists before he began the process of logical reasoning. This fault would be a problem for anyone trying to prove God’s existence through concrete logic. There is something uncertain and enigmatic about the concepts of God and religious belief that logic will never be able to penetrate.

最后一句就是now-what。它前面的一切都在为那一句赢得资格。若删掉Aquinas特有的中段,收束就会塌成一句关于神秘的贺卡——UNC的感伤失败模式。Hamilton另外两份已发表样本在其他体裁里显示同一份工作。

Hamilton College,English 150样本结论(Coetzee)

The physical disabilities of the girl serve as symbolic functions that affect how the reader interprets her relationship with the magistrate. These injuries lend themselves to symbolism because they are reflections of the weaknesses in all people—the insecurities, the compassion, and the love for one another that may manifest itself in various forms. Coetzee applies this symbolism to the complex relationship between two very different characters. The effect is a complicated and often contradictory representation of love and the emotions closely related to it.

English 150收束不复述情节,也不宣布爱很重要。它说明Coetzee的伤对读法做了什么。那就是综合。Government 112样本有用是出于另一原因:它引用Samuel Huntington的三条路径,再用它们拒绝论文并未证明的更大主张。Hu Jintao的设定是约2005年获准发表的课程论文自身时刻;把它当作Hamilton样本引用,而不是当作当前中国分析。

Hamilton College,Government 112样本结论

The coming of capitalism and modernization to China does not indicate that democracy will follow. Strong forces both within and without the CCP ensure that the status quo of one-party politics will remain. According to political theorist Samuel Huntington, there are three ways a country can democratize. There can be transformation of the power elites; however, the likelihood of this occurring under Hu Jintao, with supporters in the Standing Committee, is slim. Democratic transition may occur through replacement, but the support the CCP receives from wealthy entrepreneurs and the middle class precludes the likelihood of collapse or overthrow. Transformation, the third path to democratization, is a mixture of the first two forms and thus unlikely. The verdict is in; despite prospects for democracy, the hallmark of the present era will be increased market reform without the democratic baggage.

教学性重述——Purdue Global(2026年7月17日)

Purdue Global Academic Success Center于2026年7月17日发表一份课堂重述。Travis Murphy的帖子是教学对照,不是研究:一份关于业主协会的政策论点,然后是正文之后重述主张的收束。遗留是两步构造。Murphy先引用四句对正文要点的重述,再补上最终想法那一句。五句区块就是把那一对组装起来。用它看清重述这一步。不要把Wrightwood当成市政报告来引用。

Purdue Global Academic Success Center,“Writing The Conclusion Paragraph”(2026年7月17日)

原来的教学论点:

The Wrightwood homeowners’ association should put street cleaning services in the budget because doing so will remove trash from the street gutter, deter pests, and improve the overall appearance of the neighborhood.

正文之后重述的主张:

Providing street cleaning services to the Wrightwood neighborhood will help improve the neighborhood in three important ways.

官方四句正文重述(最终想法之前):

Providing street cleaning services to the Wrightwood neighborhood will help improve the neighborhood in three important ways. The services will keep the gutters clear, allowing rainwater to drain and avoid flooding. It will also deter pests by removing easy food sources. Improving the look and safety of the neighborhood will result in a better appearance, adding value to all the homes in the neighborhood.

官方组装收束(正文重述加上最终想法):

Providing street cleaning services to the Wrightwood neighborhood will help improve the neighborhood in three important ways. The services will keep the gutters clear, allowing rainwater to drain and avoid flooding. It will also deter pests by removing easy food sources. Improving the look and safety of the neighborhood will result in a better appearance, adding value to all the homes in the neighborhood. Having street cleaning services will improve the entire neighborhood and benefit all of the residents equally.
You may notice that the example uses no new evidence. This is because there should be no new ideas, information, or claims to support in your concluding paragraph.
Avoid starting the concluding paragraph with phrases like “In conclusion” or “In summary”. Phrases like these are informal because they are directed toward the reader and create a sudden shift in tone.

Purdue Global的收束是干净的重述。UNC和Harvard仍会要求比“benefit all of the residents equally”更锋利的so-what。用这一对学习重述这一步,再对最后一句玩UNC的“So What”游戏。

你不该忽视的学科差异

Harvard第一段就是作业核对:问教师该学科要什么。下面的划分是那一页,加上ICMJE、APA、CONSORT 2025和Toronto的体裁标题,不是新的内部体例。

  • STEM和实验报告。 收在结果改变了什么、下一项实验必须测量什么上。后续研究问题属于这里(Harvard)。不要加人文学式点缀,或数据无法支撑的政策要求(ICMJE)。
  • 社会与行为科学(APA)。 Discussion对照假设解释结果,点名优势与限度,并提出方向(Publication Manual §§3.8、3.16)。已完成结果用过去时;含义、限度和未来工作用现在时(§4.12)。不要重印Results。
  • 医学(ICMJE / Vancouver)。 以主要发现和机制开篇,放入证据总体,在那些变量重要处讨论性及/或性别,陈述限度,并把临床显著性与统计显著性分开。不要主张优先权或讨论未完成的工作。
  • 随机试验(CONSORT 2025)。 Item 29要求与结果一致、并平衡获益与伤害的解释。Item 30要求会改变用法的限度:偏倚、不精确、可推广性,以及重要时的多重性。这比反思性课程论文收束更窄。
  • 人文学科。 对中心引文的重读往往优于行动号召(Harvard)。UNC的Woolf与Douglass例子是模型:学术对话内部的含义,而不是公共服务公告。
  • 政策简报。 Toronto指出,简报可以以建议收尾,而不是反思性收束。遵循体裁,而不是本课程论文模板。

没有道歉的局限

局限句是解释的一部分,不是承认这篇论文浪费了时间。APA、ICMJE和CONSORT 2025都要求实证Discussion节写限度。UNC的课程论文讲义并不叫你用“这只是我的看法”去挖空文学论证。Harvard很直白:若需要说明范围,更早说明——并且不要为你并未写的论文道歉。

能起作用的局限句(模板,不是研究)

样本或档案有边界时使用:

这一读法限于[你实际分析的文本或年份];它并不裁定后来的版本或其他档案会如何回答同一问题。

在实证Discussion中使用:

该设计无法把[变量A]与[变量B]分开,因此这一关联不应读成因果主张。一项有用的后续研究应[能够把它们分开的检验]。

在CONSORT 2025试验Discussion中使用:

该估计不精确,因为[已在Results中的区间宽度],且样本并不代表[读者可能想治疗的人群]。这一限度会改变结果能否指导[论文实际研究的决定]。

不要写:

这篇论文有许多局限,可能是错的,但我仍希望它有用。(那是Harvard所说的道歉,不是局限。)

做 / 不要做 一览

做

  • 按证据重述主张(Harvard的what)
  • 回答UNC的“So what?”,直到句子谈的是利害,而不是题目
  • 留下now-what:问题、应用、重读或后续研究
  • 匹配体裁:课程论文收束对APA/ICMJE/CONSORT Discussion
  • 让最后一句具体(Hamilton;Toronto)

不要

  • 用“in conclusion”、“in summary”或“in closing”开篇(UNC、Harvard、Hamilton、Purdue Global)
  • 在这里第一次陈述论点(UNC的Sherlock Holmes)
  • 引入属于正文的新案例、引文或统计
  • 用爱国或感伤颂词替换分析(UNC),或写成世界饥饿收束(OWL)
  • 主张数据并不支持的临床、经济或优先权结果(ICMJE)

修改核对清单

提交之前

  • 跳过正文的读者仍能看到主张,而不是目录
  • 论点是重述的,不是从引言粘贴的
  • 至少有一句回答“why should anybody care?”(UNC)
  • 没有新来源、图表或子题第一次出现
  • 收束匹配作业:课程论文、Discussion、CONSORT试验或建议
  • 若要求局限,它们改变解释,而不是道歉
  • 已完成结果保持过去时;含义与限度用现在时(APA §4.12)
  • 最后一句是想法,不是清嗓子的过渡
  • 收束所依赖的来源都已在正文中引用;用APA、MLA或Chicago格式化那些记录

先完成论文,再格式化列表

结论修不好缺失的主张。先收紧论点,再写收束。论证稳定后,生成课程实际要求的参考文献列表。

相关指南

结论常见问题

怎样写结论才不会重复自己?
UNC的检验是综合,不是更短的目录。用证据使之成为可能的措辞重述主张,然后说明正文各段如何拼合。OWL的布道者格言(“把你讲过的再讲一遍”)是起步提纲,不是完成的收束。若删掉最后一段并不丢失任何想法,你写的是总结。玩“So What”游戏,直到有一句谈的是利害。
可以用“In conclusion”开始结论吗?
学术散文中不行。UNC、Harvard、Hamilton和Purdue Global(2026年7月17日)都把“in conclusion”、“in summary”和“in closing”标为生硬。那些短语在演讲里可以奏效。在论文里,它们通常引出一句还不是结论的句子(Harvard的例子:“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)。
结论应该多长?
Toronto:多数论文用一段充分展开的段落;论文长到需要时用两三段。让收束匹配论文,而不是百分比。实证文章使用长度遵循APA 7或期刊的Discussion,而不是从五页论文抄来的五句收束。CONSORT 2025试验即使Discussion很短,仍须履行Item 29和30。
我可以在结尾引入新引文或统计数字吗?
几乎从不作为未用过的证据。UNC把遗留引文和统计列为失败模式(Grab Bag)。Toronto只允许贴切引文或惊人统计在把正文已经作出的点钉死时出现——不是在你偷偷塞进忘掉的来源时。OWL的世界饥饿收束是同一错误的更大尺度。若那个数字需要解释,它属于更前面。
Discussion和结论是一回事吗?
在APA和ICMJE原创研究文章中,Discussion就是收束节:解释、语境、局限和含义。APA的Discussion Phrases Guide说,随笔和反应论文可以用同一标题反思主题。它不是每篇课程论文的反思性末段。有的学生论文仍用Conclusion标题,因为教师要求。遵循那条提示。CONSORT 2025 Items 29–30是随机试验的额外义务,不是“最后一段”的同义词。
若被要求不要重复论点,它该放在哪里?
重述它,不要粘贴它。UNC说,以未改动的改写收尾是失败的收束,而在最后一段第一次陈述论点是Sherlock Holmes错误。Purdue Global的Wrightwood对照显示重述这一步:主张在正文之后以新措辞回来。主张应已出现在引言。
我必须提到局限吗?
在实证Discussion中,必须——APA 7、ICMJE和CONSORT 2025期望那些会改变结果用法的限度。ICMJE 2026年1月还要求你在那些变量重要处讨论性及/或性别。CONSORT Item 30点名偏倚、不精确、可推广性和多重性。在人文学科论文中,含糊的“这只是我的解释”是道歉,不是局限。若所用档案、版本或比较的边界会改变主张,就点名它。
结论和摘要有何不同?
摘要是独立概要,常常报告结果,好让读者决定是否打开论文。结论假定读者刚读完正文,准备接受意义,而不是第二份梗概。不要把摘要贴进最后一节。
文学论文该如何收尾?
Harvard的例子是中心文本中现在可以不同读法的引文。UNC的Woolf例子指向后来的作家或后来的女权主义者。Hamilton的English 150 Coetzee样本收在伤对读法做了什么,而不是情节复述。不要硬加细读并未论证的公共政策建议。
我应该在结论中引用来源吗?
当你点名来源时就引用,正如Harvard在Roser的收束中对待behavioral mediation hypothesis,以及Hamilton的Government 112样本对待Huntington。不要引入正文从未出现过的来源。按课程指定的体例——APA、MLA或Chicago——格式化论文已经使用的每条记录,并用引用生成器生成列表。