如何为课程论文或研究论文写结论
结论是论文的最后一节,不是第二份摘要,也不是粘贴过来的论点句。UNC Writing Center说,它应综合你的思考,说明这些想法为何重要,并把读者推向对该对象的新看法。本页就是这份写法指南。它不是打开论文的如何写引言,也不是覆盖整篇草稿的如何写研究论文。
作者:CitationEasy Editorial Team阅读约 25 分钟

本页内容
简要回答:如何写结论
Harvard College Writing Center在每个学科都问同样三个问题:what(论文确立了什么),so what(那些利害为何仍然重要),now what(正文真正赢得的问题、应用或行动)。University of Toronto Writing Advice补上长度规则:多数论文用一段充分展开的段落;只有论文长到需要时,才用两三段。不要在最后一段发明新主张、新来源或新统计数字。
起步模板(从你写过的论文填写;不要捏造证据)
课程论文 / 人文学科论文:
这样读来,是[证据之后重述的中心主张],而不仅仅是[题目]。它改变我们看待[文本、事件或论争]的方式,因为[正文赢得的 so what]。下一个问题是[在分析之前本无意义的问题]。
实证 / IMRaD论文(Discussion,不是第二份Results清单):
这些结果表明[一句话的发现],与[点名的既有研究]一致,与[该设计实际能检验的对立假设]不一致。主要局限是[会改变解释的那一项]。一项有用的后续研究应[能补上该缺口的设计]。
政策或应用论文:
因为[论文中已有的证据],[谁]应当[发现所支持的具体行动],而不是[通常的替代方案]。维持现行做法不变,将[论文实际能辩护的后果]。
只用论点句生成器收紧你正要回扣的主张。然后用CitationEasy生成器引用真正支撑该主张的来源。
结论是做什么的——官方定义
四家写作中心描述同一份工作。UNC点出修辞工作,并把最后一段称为礼物。Toronto点出收束,再加上更宽的框架。Hamilton College的Nesbitt-Johnston Writing Center点出正当化:为什么这场论证值得做。Purdue Global Academic Success Center(2026年7月17日)点出最后印象:重述的主张、正文已经赢得的支撑,以及一个最终想法。没有一家把最后一段当作标题复述。
UNC Writing Center,“Conclusions”
Your conclusion is your chance to have the last word on the subject. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts, to demonstrate the importance of your ideas, and to propel your reader to a new view of the subject.
Just as your introduction acts as a bridge that transports your readers from their own lives into the “place” of your analysis, your conclusion can provide a bridge to help your readers make the transition back to their daily lives.
Synthesize, don’t summarize. Include a brief summary of the paper’s main points, but don’t simply repeat things that were in your paper. Instead, show your reader how the points you made and the support and examples you used fit together. Pull it all together.
Your conclusion can go beyond the confines of the assignment. The conclusion pushes beyond the boundaries of the prompt and allows you to consider broader issues, make new connections, and elaborate on the significance of your findings.
Your conclusion should make your readers glad they read your paper. Your conclusion gives your reader something to take away that will help them see things differently or appreciate your topic in personally relevant ways. It can suggest broader implications that will not only interest your reader, but also enrich your reader’s life in some way. It is your gift to the reader.
University of Toronto Writing Advice,“Introductions and Conclusions”(Leora Freedman and Jerry Plotnick)
A strong conclusion will provide a sense of closure to the essay while again placing your concepts in a somewhat wider context. It will also, in some instances, add a stimulus to further thought.
A conclusion is not merely a summary of your points or a re-statement of your thesis. If you wish to summarize—and often you must—do so in fresh language. Remind the reader of how the evidence you’ve presented has contributed to your thesis.
A good last sentence leaves your reader with something to think about, a concept in some way illuminated by what you’ve written in the paper.
Hamilton College Writing Center,“Conclusions”
You might begin a conclusion by reminding the reader of your thesis and main points, but a conclusion is not a summary. A successful conclusion brings your argument to a logical close; it is where you justify your argument to the reader.
Use your conclusion to describe the consequences of your argument, to answer the question “why is my argument important?”
Do not begin with the unnecessary and over-worked phrase “in conclusion.”
Make a reasonable final claim; don't overstate your findings.
Take special care with your final sentence; make sure it is carefully constructed and leaves a strong impression.
课程论文结论对研究论文Discussion
最后一节的标题是体裁选择,不是同义词。课程论文通常以你可以称为结论的一节结束。APA或Vancouver体例的实证文章通常以解释结果的Discussion结束。不要把课程论文收束贴到实验报告上,也不要把细读论文变成带有你并未赢得的假“局限”段的IMRaD Discussion。
课程论文 / 人文学科论文
实证 / 医学 / APA论文
- 对照假设或目的解释结果
- 把发现放进已发表证据,而不仅是你的样本
- 陈述会改变结果用法的局限
- 点名数据所支持的后续研究或实践含义
- 不重复Results节,也不发明经济主张
APA Style的Discussion Phrases Guide(第7版)把Discussion当作论文的收束节。那里用现在时。定量与定性报告细节见Publication Manual(第7版)§§3.8和3.16。学生论文仍听从教师:有的课要求标题为Conclusion;许多心理学报告要求Discussion,不要单独收束。
APA Style,Discussion Phrases Guide(第7版)
Papers usually end with a concluding section, often called the “Discussion.” The Discussion is your opportunity to evaluate and interpret the results of your study or paper, draw inferences and conclusions from it, and communicate its contributions to science and/or society. Use the present tense when writing the Discussion section.
In the Discussion section of a research paper, you should evaluate and interpret the implications of study results with respect to your original hypotheses. It is also where you can discuss your study’s importance, present its strengths and limitations, and propose new directions for future research.
连接发现的官方用语(填空;不要捏造研究):
This pattern of results is consistent with the previous literature … (citation).
写局限的官方用语:
One limitation of this study is that … It is possible that ... Although the present research cannot rule out these explanations, it seems useful to point out issues that may conflict with these results.
医学期刊遵循ICMJE Recommendations(2026年1月更新)。Discussion不是第二份Results倾倒,收束主张必须与数据相符。2026年1月文本还要求作者在那些变量重要的地方讨论性及/或性别。
ICMJE Recommendations,“Discussion”(2026年1月)
It is useful to begin the discussion by briefly summarizing the main findings, and explore possible mechanisms or explanations for these findings. Emphasize the new and important aspects of your study and put your findings in the context of the totality of the relevant evidence. State the limitations of your study, and explore the implications of your findings for future research and for clinical practice or policy.
Discuss the influence or association of variables, such as sex and/or gender, on your findings, where appropriate, and the limitations of the data. Do not repeat in detail data or other information given in other parts of the manuscript, such as in the Introduction or the Results section.
Link the conclusions with the goals of the study but avoid unqualified statements and conclusions not adequately supported by the data. In particular, distinguish between clinical and statistical significance, and avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless the manuscript includes the appropriate economic data and analyses. Avoid claiming priority or alluding to work that has not been completed. State new hypotheses when warranted, but label them clearly.
Harvard的三步:What、So What、Now What
Harvard那一页是最短的工作方法。第一步是过渡,不是清单。第二步回到你在引言中点出的利害,然后拓宽。第三步是读者能带出房间的那一句。Harvard写得很明确:STEM论文常常收在后续研究问题,而文学论文可以依据论证重读中心文本中的一行。
Harvard College Writing Center,“Conclusions”
How you conclude your paper will depend on where you started—and where you traveled.
In a short paper—even a research paper—you don’t need to provide an exhaustive summary as part of your conclusion.
After the “what” and the “so what,” you should leave your reader with some final thoughts.
What can my readers now understand, see in a new light, or grapple with that they would not have understood in the same way before reading my paper?
What questions can I now raise that would not have made sense at the beginning of my paper? Questions for further research? Other ways that this topic could be approached?
fake transitions like “in conclusion” that are followed by sentences that aren’t actually conclusions. (“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)
Harvard的示范是Vanessa Roser关于ADHD与拒绝敏感(RS)的论文。那些句子是她的,写作中心按原样发表在Strategies for Essay Writing手册(2024年3月)里。它们不是可以复制到无关题目上的模板。
Harvard的Vanessa Roser范例(ADHD与拒绝敏感)
论点(论文要证明的):
While socialization may indeed be an important factor in RS, I argue that individuals with ADHD may also possess a neurological predisposition to RS that is exacerbated by the differing executive and emotional regulation characteristic of ADHD.
结论回声(文献之后重述的what):
This literature demonstrates that, as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.
Now-what(过错与治疗):
seems to place a degree of fault on the individual. It implies that individuals with ADHD must have elicited such frequent or intense rejection by virtue of their inadequate social skills, erasing the possibility that they may simply possess a natural sensitivity to emotion.
Now-what(谁该在意):
has profound implications for understanding how individuals with ADHD might best be treated in educational settings, by counselors, family, peers, or even society as a whole.
注意Roser没有做的事。她不再列一遍每项研究。她不宣布“in conclusion”。她不为没读过的论文道歉。她依据文献重述主张,然后说明错误理论会让真实的人付出什么代价。那就是两步完成的so-what和now-what。
真正推动最后一段的UNC策略
修改时该打开的是UNC讲义。下面的策略是他们的。用一两种。全部叠上去,就会变成UNC警告的grab-bag收尾。
玩“So What”游戏
UNC的诊断是一段对话,不是公式。每写完一句收束,就问“So what?”,再问“Why should anybody care?”。他们发表的例子用Frederick Douglass的Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself——讲义参考文献里列出的书,不是捏造的案例。
UNC的Douglass“So What”对答
你:
Basically, I’m just saying that education was important to Douglass.
朋友:
So what?
你:
Well, it was important because it was a key to him feeling like a free and equal citizen.
朋友:
Why should anybody care?
你:
That’s important because plantation owners tried to keep slaves from being educated so that they could maintain control. When Douglass obtained an education, he undermined that control personally.
第一句是题目。最后一句是关于权力的主张。若草稿听起来仍像第一行,你还没有结论,只有重述。
回到引言——然后改变它
UNC和Toronto都建议闭合圆圈:回到开篇的情景、轶事或引文,但只有在正文已经赢得新读法之后。Toronto的措辞是有用的约束:加入来自论文的进一步洞见,不要重放钩子。UNC指出,以Greensboro静坐开篇的论文,可以收在把该事件放入整个民权运动。关于Virginia Woolf文风的论文,可以收在后来的作家或后来的女权主义者。那些是UNC的例子,不是让你发明静坐统计数字的提示。
提出一项行动、一种解决或下一个问题
这是Harvard的now what与UNC的“行动方针”合为一步。只有正文已经论证过该行动时才有效。文学论文很少需要政策建议。实验报告很少需要沉思。Hamilton补上对应警告:作一个合理的最终主张;不要夸大发现。Hamilton还列出其他讲义只隐含的一步:在作业允许时提出限定或对立观点。
UNC Writing Center,该用的策略
Return to the theme or themes in the introduction. This strategy brings the reader full circle. For example, if you begin by describing a scenario, you can end with the same scenario as proof that your essay is helpful in creating a new understanding.
Propose a course of action, a solution to an issue, or questions for further study. This can redirect your reader’s thought process and help them to apply your info and ideas to their own life or to see the broader implications.
Point to broader implications. For example, if your paper examines the Greensboro sit-ins or another event in the Civil Rights Movement, you could point out its impact on the Civil Rights Movement as a whole. A paper about the style of writer Virginia Woolf could point to her influence on other writers or on later feminists.
Toronto超越总结的七步
最后一段准确但仍只是复述时,该用Toronto的清单。这七步是Freedman和Plotnick的,不是本站体例。选你的体裁已经赢得的那一步。Toronto也警告体裁会改变收尾:带注释的书目通常没有结论,书评可以收在总体评价,政策简报可以收在建议。
University of Toronto,“How do I write an interesting, effective conclusion?”
If your essay deals with a contemporary problem, warn readers of the possible consequences of not attending to the problem.
Recommend a specific course of action.
Use an apt quotation or expert opinion to lend authority to the conclusion you have reached.
Give a startling statistic, fact, or visual image to drive home the ultimate point of your paper.
If your discipline encourages personal reflection, illustrate your concluding point with a relevant narrative drawn from your own life experiences.
Return to an anecdote, example, or quotation that you introduced in your introduction, but add further insight that derives from the body of your essay.
In a science or social science paper, mention worthwhile avenues for future research on your topic.
A policy briefing usually includes an introduction but may conclude with a series of recommendations.
不要做什么——UNC回避清单与四种失败收尾
UNC的回避清单比泛泛的“别无聊”更精确。Harvard的回避清单有重叠,并补上UNC只隐含的两种失败:你无法反驳的新反论,以及为没写的论文道歉。两份清单都留着;它们抓住不同失败。
UNC Writing Center,该避免的策略
Beginning with an unnecessary, overused phrase such as “in conclusion,” “in summary,” or “in closing.” Although these phrases can work in speeches, they come across as wooden and trite in writing.
Stating the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion.
Introducing a new idea or subtopic in your conclusion.
Ending with a rephrased thesis statement without any substantive changes.
Making sentimental, emotional appeals that are out of character with the rest of an analytical paper.
Including evidence (quotations, statistics, etc.) that should be in the body of the paper.
Harvard College Writing Center,该避免的
a complete restatement of all that you have said in your paper.
a substantial counterargument that you do not have space to refute; you should introduce counterarguments before your conclusion.
an apology for what you have not said. If you need to explain the scope of your paper, you should do this sooner—but don’t apologize for what you have not discussed in your paper.
UNC接着点出四种无效类型。例子是他们的,写的是Douglass。那是不要写的。第一种是带演讲过渡的重述。第二种把论点藏到最后一行。第三种用颂词替换分析。第四种把未用过的研究偷运进收束。
UNC:四种无效结论(不要模仿)
“That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It”:
In conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery.
“Sherlock Holmes”(论点压到最后才说):
So, as the evidence above demonstrates, Douglass saw education as a way to undermine the slaveholders’ power and also an important step toward freedom.
“America the Beautiful” / “I Am Woman” / “We Shall Overcome”:
Because of the efforts of fine Americans like Frederick Douglass, countless others have seen the shining beacon of light that is education. His example was a torch that lit the way for others. Frederick Douglass was truly an American hero.
“Grab Bag”:
In addition to being an educational pioneer, Frederick Douglass provides an interesting case study for masculinity in the American South. He also offers historians an interesting glimpse into slave resistance when he confronts Covey, the overseer. His relationships with female relatives reveal the importance of family in the slave community.
结论应该多长?
不要用博客上找来的百分比。Toronto才是你能向教师辩护的规则:
University of Toronto,长度
For most essays, one well-developed paragraph is sufficient for a conclusion. In some cases, a two-or-three paragraph conclusion may be appropriate. As with introductions, the length of the conclusion should reflect the length of the essay.
五页细读却需要两页收束,就是注水。学位论文章节只用五句收尾,就是未完成。期刊文章因场地而异:有的科学短讯把解释折进很短的末段;ICMJE原创研究文章使用完整Discussion。在抄同学的字数之前,先问作业、期刊或导师。
| 体裁 | 典型收束 | “完成”的样子 |
|---|---|---|
| 短课程论文(约5–8页) | 一段(Toronto默认) | 新措辞的论点、综合、一句so-what |
| 长论文或章节 | 两三段(Toronto) | 同样的工作,外加回到开篇或下一个问题 |
| APA / IMRaD文章 | Discussion节(APA 7 §§3.8、3.16) | 解释、证据语境、局限、后续研究 |
| 医学原创研究 | ICMJE Discussion(2026年1月) | 机制、证据总体、相关处的性/性别、限度、实践或政策 |
已发表的学生结论——Hamilton College
Hamilton发表真实课程的样本结论,并得到Sarah Gould '05和Matthew Marks '05许可。保留措辞;不要把它们归档到虚假引用下。Philosophy 110样本做的是so-what工作:它不重述Aquinas的证明,也不宣布上帝是大题目。它说明论证方法付出了什么代价。
Hamilton College,Philosophy 110样本结论
It is a natural, human inclination to wonder if God exists. Aquinas, like many other philosophers, attempted to prove God’s existence through logical reasoning. His arguments, however, seem to be based on the presumption that there is in fact a God. He went on from this supposition to question human concepts, such as the way that we determine what is good, true, and noble. If no obvious, tangible cause for a concept or behavior could be found, he concluded that God must be the cause and then claimed proof of God’s existence. Aquinas was clearly biased in his study of God; he seemed to have a firm belief that God exists before he began the process of logical reasoning. This fault would be a problem for anyone trying to prove God’s existence through concrete logic. There is something uncertain and enigmatic about the concepts of God and religious belief that logic will never be able to penetrate.
最后一句就是now-what。它前面的一切都在赢得那一句。若删掉Aquinas特有的中间部分,收束会塌成一句关于神秘的贺卡台词——UNC的感伤失败。Hamilton另外两份已发表样本在其他体裁里做同一份工作。
Hamilton College,English 150样本结论(Coetzee)
The physical disabilities of the girl serve as symbolic functions that affect how the reader interprets her relationship with the magistrate. These injuries lend themselves to symbolism because they are reflections of the weaknesses in all people—the insecurities, the compassion, and the love for one another that may manifest itself in various forms. Coetzee applies this symbolism to the complex relationship between two very different characters. The effect is a complicated and often contradictory representation of love and the emotions closely related to it.
English 150收束不重述情节,也不宣布爱情重要。它说明Coetzee的伤对读法做了什么。那就是综合。Government 112样本有用是因为另一点:它引用Samuel Huntington的三条路径,再用它们拒绝论文并未证明的更大主张。Hu Jintao的设定是那篇课程论文自己的时刻,约2005年获准发表;把它当作Hamilton样本来引,不要当作当前中国分析。
Hamilton College,Government 112样本结论
The coming of capitalism and modernization to China does not indicate that democracy will follow. Strong forces both within and without the CCP ensure that the status quo of one-party politics will remain. According to political theorist Samuel Huntington, there are three ways a country can democratize. There can be transformation of the power elites; however, the likelihood of this occurring under Hu Jintao, with supporters in the Standing Committee, is slim. Democratic transition may occur through replacement, but the support the CCP receives from wealthy entrepreneurs and the middle class precludes the likelihood of collapse or overthrow. Transformation, the third path to democratization, is a mixture of the first two forms and thus unlikely. The verdict is in; despite prospects for democracy, the hallmark of the present era will be increased market reform without the democratic baggage.
一份教学重述——Purdue Global(2026年7月17日)
Purdue Global Academic Success Center于2026年7月17日发表一份课堂重述。Travis Murphy的帖子是教学对照,不是研究:一条关于业主协会的政策论点,然后是正文之后重述主张的收束。用它看重述这一步。不要把Wrightwood当作市政报告来引用。
Purdue Global Academic Success Center,“Writing The Conclusion Paragraph”(2026年7月17日)
原来的教学论点:
The Wrightwood homeowners’ association should put street cleaning services in the budget because doing so will remove trash from the street gutter, deter pests, and improve the overall appearance of the neighborhood.
正文之后重述的主张:
Providing street cleaning services to the Wrightwood neighborhood will help improve the neighborhood in three important ways.
完整教学收束(无新证据):
Providing street cleaning services to the Wrightwood neighborhood will help improve the neighborhood in three important ways. The services will keep the gutters clear, allowing rainwater to drain and avoid flooding. It will also deter pests by removing easy food sources. Improving the look and safety of the neighborhood will result in a better appearance, adding value to all the homes in the neighborhood. Having street cleaning services will improve the entire neighborhood and benefit all of the residents equally.
You may notice that the example uses no new evidence. This is because there should be no new ideas, information, or claims to support in your concluding paragraph.
Avoid starting the concluding paragraph with phrases like “In conclusion” or “In summary”. Phrases like these are informal because they are directed toward the reader and create a sudden shift in tone.
Purdue Global的收束是干净的重述。UNC和Harvard仍会要求比“benefit all of the residents equally”更锐利的so-what。用这对例子学习重述这一步,然后对最后一句玩UNC的“So What”游戏。
不该忽略的学科差异
Harvard第一段就是作业核对:问教师该学科要什么。下面的划分是那一页加上ICMJE和APA,不是新的本站体例。
- STEM和实验报告。 收在结果改变了什么、下一步实验必须测量什么。后续研究问题属于这里(Harvard)。不要加人文学式的华丽收尾,也不要提出数据无法支撑的政策要求(ICMJE)。
- 社会与行为科学(APA)。 Discussion对照假设解释结果,点出优势与限度,并提出方向(Publication Manual §§3.8、3.16)。现在时。不要重印Results。
- 医学(ICMJE / Vancouver)。 以主要发现和机制开篇,放入证据总体,在那些变量重要处讨论性及/或性别,陈述限度,并区分临床显著性与统计显著性。不要主张优先权,也不要讨论未完成的工作。
- 人文学科。 重读一条中心引文往往优于行动号召(Harvard)。UNC的Woolf与Douglass例子是模型:学术对话内部的含义,不是公益广告。
- 政策简报。 Toronto指出,简报可以收在建议,而不是反思性收束。跟随体裁,而不是这份课程论文模板。
没有道歉的局限
局限句是解释的一部分,不是承认论文浪费了时间。APA和ICMJE都要求实证Discussion节写限度。UNC的课程论文讲义并不让你用“这只是我的意见”拆毁文学论证。Harvard很直白:若需要说明范围,更早说——不要为没写的论文道歉。
能办事的局限句(模板,不是研究)
样本或档案有边界时用:
这一读法限于[你实际分析的文本或年份];它并不裁定后来的版本或其他档案会如何回答同一问题。
用在实证Discussion:
该设计无法把[变量A]与[变量B]分开,因此不应把该关联读成因果主张。一项有用的后续研究应[能把两者分开的检验]。
不要这样写:
这篇论文有许多局限,可能是错的,但我仍希望它有用。(那是Harvard所说的道歉,不是局限。)
要做 / 不要做一览
要做
- 依据证据重述主张(Harvard的what)
- 回答UNC的“So what?”,直到句子谈的是利害,不是题目
- 留下now-what:问题、应用、重读或后续研究
- 匹配体裁:课程论文收束对APA/ICMJE Discussion
- 让最后一句具体(Hamilton;Toronto)
不要做
- 以“in conclusion”、“in summary”或“in closing”开篇(UNC、Harvard、Hamilton、Purdue Global)
- 在这里第一次陈述论点(UNC的Sherlock Holmes)
- 引入属于正文的新案例、引文或统计数字
- 用爱国或感伤颂词替换分析(UNC)
- 主张数据并不支持的临床、经济或优先权结果(ICMJE)
修改清单
提交之前
- 跳过正文的读者仍能看见主张,而不是目录
- 论点被重述,而不是从引言粘贴过来
- 至少有一句回答“why should anybody care?”(UNC)
- 没有新来源、图表或子题第一次出现
- 收束匹配作业:课程论文、Discussion或建议
- 若要求写局限,它改变解释,而不是道歉
- 最后一句是思考,不是清嗓子式的过渡
- 收束所依赖的每一条来源已在正文引用;用APA、MLA或Chicago格式化那些记录
相关指南
结论常见问题
- 怎样写结论才不会重复自己?
- UNC的检验是综合,不是更短的目录。用证据使之成为可能的措辞重述主张,然后说明正文各段如何拼合。若删掉最后一段并不丢失任何想法,你写的是总结。玩“So What”游戏,直到有一句谈的是利害。
- 可以用“In conclusion”开始结论吗?
- 学术散文中不行。UNC、Harvard、Hamilton和Purdue Global(2026年7月17日)都把“in conclusion”、“in summary”和“in closing”标为生硬。那些短语在演讲里可以奏效。在论文里,它们通常引出一句还不是结论的句子(Harvard的例子:“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)。
- 结论应该多长?
- Toronto:多数论文用一段充分展开的段落;论文长到需要时用两三段。让收束匹配论文,而不是百分比。实证文章使用长度遵循APA 7或期刊的Discussion,而不是从五页论文抄来的五句收束。
- 我可以在结尾引入新引文或统计数字吗?
- 几乎从不作为未用过的证据。UNC把剩余引文和统计列为失败模式(Grab Bag)。Toronto只允许贴切引文或惊人统计在把正文已经作出的点钉死时出现——不是在你偷偷塞进忘掉的来源时。若那个数字需要解释,它属于更前面。
- Discussion和结论是一回事吗?
- 在APA和ICMJE原创研究文章中,Discussion就是收束节:解释、语境、局限和含义。APA的Discussion Phrases Guide说用现在时,不要重印Results。它不是课程论文的反思性末段。有的学生论文仍用Conclusion标题,因为教师要求。遵循那条提示。
- 若被要求不要重复论点,它该放在哪里?
- 重述它,不要粘贴它。UNC说,以未改动的改写收尾是失败的收束,而在最后一段第一次陈述论点是Sherlock Holmes错误。Purdue Global的Wrightwood对照显示重述这一步:主张在正文之后以新措辞回来。主张应已出现在引言。
- 我必须提到局限吗?
- 在实证Discussion中,必须——APA 7和ICMJE期望那些会改变结果用法的限度。ICMJE 2026年1月还要求你在那些变量重要处讨论性及/或性别。在人文学科论文中,含糊的“这只是我的解释”是道歉,不是局限。若所用档案、版本或比较的边界会改变主张,就点名它。
- 结论和摘要有何不同?
- 摘要是独立概要,常常报告结果,好让读者决定是否打开论文。结论假定读者刚读完正文,准备接受意义,而不是第二份梗概。不要把摘要贴进最后一节。
- 文学论文该如何收尾?
- Harvard的例子是中心文本中现在可以不同读法的引文。UNC的Woolf例子指向后来的作家或后来的女权主义者。Hamilton的English 150 Coetzee样本收在伤对读法做了什么,而不是情节复述。不要硬加细读并未论证的公共政策建议。
- 我应该在结论中引用来源吗?
- 当你点名来源时就引用,正如Harvard在Roser的收束中对待behavioral mediation hypothesis,以及Hamilton的Government 112样本对待Huntington。不要引入正文从未出现过的来源。按课程指定的体例——APA、MLA或Chicago——格式化论文已经使用的每条记录,并用引用生成器生成列表。