注釈付き文献リストの書き方

課題の文:

この[授業またはプロジェクト]向けの注釈付き文献リストは、[研究課題]に関する[件数]件の出典を集め、それぞれを[要約する / 評価する / 要約し評価する]。

APA 7の引用テンプレート:

姓, I. I., & 姓, J. J. (2020). 書名. 出版社名. https://doi.org/xx

APA 7の注釈テンプレート:

著者らは[論旨]を主張する。[方法または証拠]を用い、[知見]と結論づける。この著作は[具体的な用途]のため、[自分の問い]に有用である。ただし[標本、日付、または偏り]によって限界がある。

MLA 9の引用テンプレート:

姓, 名. 書名. 出版社名, 2020.

MLA 9の注釈テンプレート:

[主題]の[統合 / 歴史 / 研究]であり、[主たる主張]する。[方法または分野]に依拠し、[具体的な用途]のため[自分のプロジェクト]に有用である。

Chicago 18 Notes-Bibliographyのテンプレート:

姓, 名. 書名. 出版社名, 2020. 注釈は次の行から始め、通常はインデントする。

An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.

Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they may describe the author's point of view, authority, or clarity and appropriateness of expression.

[G]ood annotations accurately and incisively—but not cryptically—distill the essence of works

focus the reader's attention on major points

Most APA Style guidelines are applicable to annotated bibliographies.

Annotated bibliographies consist of reference list entries followed by short descriptions of the work called annotations. Instructors generally set requirements, but APA Style guidelines still apply.

Each annotation should be a new paragraph below its reference entry. Indent the entire annotation 0.5 in. from the left margin, the same as you would a block quotation (see Section 8.27). Do not indent the first line of the annotation.

If the annotation spans multiple paragraphs, indent the first line of the second and any subsequent paragraphs an additional 0.5 in., the same as you would a block quotation with multiple paragraphs.

It is not necessary to cite the work being annotated in the annotation because the origin of the information is clear through context; however, do include in-text citations (see Chapter 8) if you refer to multiple works within an annotation to clarify the source.

参考文献:

Barber, L. K., Grawitch, M. J., & Maloney, P. W. (2016). Work-life balance: Contemporary perspectives. In M. J. Grawitch & D. W. Ballard (Eds.), The psychologically healthy workplace: Building a win-win environment for organizations and employees (pp. 111-133). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14731-006

注釈:

This book chapter provides an overview of the psychosociological concept of work-life balance. The authors discuss findings from studies showing harmful effects of work-life conflict on psychological and behavioral health as well as beneficial effects of work-life facilitation, wherein one role makes a positive contribution to the other. The chapter concludes with a description of work-life balance initiatives that organizations have adopted to help employees manage their dual work and nonwork obligations and some of the key factors influencing their effectiveness.

Students should style a source in an annotated bibliography just as they would in a list of works cited and then append an annotation to the end of the entry.

The list should be titled Annotated Bibliography or Annotated List of Works Cited. Students may organize the bibliography alphabetically by author or title (as for a normal list of works cited), by the date of publication, or by subject.

句スタイルの項目:

Harbord, Janet. The Evolution of Film: Rethinking Film Studies. Polity, 2007. A synthesis of classic film theory and an examination of the state of film studies as of 2007 that draws on contemporary scholarship in philosophy, anthropology, and media studies.

完全文の注釈:

This synthesis of classic film theory examines the state of film studies as of 2007. It draws on contemporary scholarship in philosophy, anthropology, and media studies.

Works Cited行:

Moore, Nicole. The Censor's Library: Uncovering the Lost History of Australia's Banned Books. U of Queensland P, 2012.

注釈:

The book provides a comprehensive history of Australian print censorship and discusses its implications for questions of transnationalism and the construction of the reader.

Annotated bibliographies include annotations that summarize the cited sources. Students may also be asked to describe how they intend to use a source for their project.

The Chicago Manual of Style tells us that annotations may simply follow the publication details [often in brackets] or they may start on a new line (and are often indented 0.5 in. from the left margin).

Do not indent the first line of the annotation.

CMOS 17見本引用（都市を含む）:

Allen, Donald M., ed. The New American Poetry. New York: Grove Press, 1960.

同じ本のCMOS 18文献リスト形式:

Allen, Donald M., ed. The New American Poetry. Grove Press, 1960.

注釈見本:

Concentrates on the postwar period from 1945 to 1960 and presents the work of poets who identified themselves with antiformalist movements or waves, often associated with fugitive publications and little magazines (Yugen, Neon, Kulchur, Big Table, etc.): the most prominent groups were the Black Mountain school (Olson, Duncan) and the experimental city poets from New York (like Frank O'Hara, LeRoi Jones, and Gilbert Sorrentino) and San Francisco (the "Beats" Kerouac, Corso, Ginsberg). John Ashbery, James Schuyler, Denise Levertov, and Gary Snyder are also represented.

APA 7の引用:

Waite, L., Goldschneider, F., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 541-554.

MLA 9の引用:

Waite, Linda J., et al. "Nonfamily Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults." American Sociological Review, vol. 51, no. 4, 1986, pp. 541-554.

コーネルの注釈（両スタイルで同じ段落）:

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

両見本が共有する引用:

McIvor, S. D. (1995). Aboriginal women’s rights as “existing rights.” Canadian Woman Studies/Les Cahiers de la Femme 2/3, 34-38.

内容を列挙するだけ（避けるべきこと）:

This article discusses recent constitutional legislation as it affects the human rights of aboriginal women in Canada: the Constitution Act (1982), its amendment in 1983, and amendments to the Indian Act (1985). It also discusses the implications for aboriginal women of the Supreme Court of Canada’s interpretation of the Constitution Act in R. v. Sparrow (1991).

議論を特定する（書くべきこと）:

This article seeks to define the extent of the civil and political rights returned to aboriginal women in the Constitution Act (1982), in its amendment in 1983, and in amendments to the Indian Act (1985). This legislation reverses prior laws that denied Indian status to aboriginal women who married non-aboriginal men. On the basis of the Supreme Court of Canada’s interpretation of the Constitution Act in R. v. Sparrow (1991), McIvor argues that the Act recognizes fundamental human rights and existing aboriginal rights, granting to aboriginal women full participation in the aboriginal right to self-government.

• すべての引用が指定スタイルに合い、ぶら下げインデントを使っている
• 項目が課題の指定した順になっている（通常は著者A–Z）
• 各注釈が引用の下の新しい段落で、そのスタイルが求めるインデントになっている
• 段落が論旨または問い、方法、結論を述べている
• 課題が求めるときは評価が具体的である
• 貼り付けた抄録、出版社の宣伝文、発明した引用がない
• 注釈で名前を付けた第二の著作もリストにある
• 単独論文の課題なら、タイトルページまたはランニングヘッドがスタイルに合う