如何引用 ChatGPT 及其他 AI 工具

APA 第7版共享聊天：

AI公司. (年份, 月 日). 共享聊天的标题 [Generative AI chat]. 工具或模型. URL

APA 第7版一般工具：

AI公司. (年份). 工具或模型 [Large language model]. URL

APA 文内引用：

(AI公司, 年份) 或 AI公司 (年份)

MLA 第9版引用文献：

"你的提示文本" 提示. ChatGPT, 模型或版本, 出版者, 日 月 年份, URL.

MLA 文内引用：

("缩短的提示")

Chicago 第18版注释（问答，2026年1月10日）：

1. Text generated by ChatGPT, OpenAI, January 10, 2026, URL.

带提示的 Chicago 第18版注释：

1. ChatGPT, response to “Explain how to make pizza dough from common household ingredients,” OpenAI, January 10, 2026, URL.

AI itself cannot be an author because it is not a living, conscious human who can give consent and promise to abide by the rights and responsibilities that come with authorship.

Include a reference and in-text citation for a specific AI chat foremostly when doing so will be helpful for readers.

AI Company Name. (year, month day). Title of chat in italics [Description, such as Generative AI chat]. Tool Name/Model. URL of the chat

AI Company Name. (year). Tool Name/Model in Italics and Title Case [Description; e.g., Large language model]. URL of the tool

ChatGPT：

OpenAI. (2025, August 21). High school grammar concepts [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT. https://chatgpt.com/share/68a77b60-0ee4-800c-9acc-cd3fd573c311

Claude：

Anthropic. (2025, May 20). Essential grammar topics for high school graduates [Generative AI chat]. Claude Sonnet 4. https://claude.ai/share/329173b2-ec93-4663-ac68-4f65ea4f166d

Gemini：

Google. (2025, May 22). High school grammar concepts overview [Generative AI chat]. Gemini 2.5 Flash. https://g.co/gemini/share/a1306ce12929

Perplexity：

Perplexity AI. (2025, May 20). High school grammar topics [Generative AI chat]. Perplexity. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/a457cb8c-c663-4c9b-b34e-cb03d8108b35

括号引用：

(Anthropic, 2025; Google, 2025; OpenAI, 2025; Perplexity AI, 2025)

叙述引用：

Anthropic (2025), Google (2025), OpenAI (2025), and Perplexity AI (2025)

Anthropic. (2025). Claude 4 Sonnet [Large language model]. https://claude.ai/new

Google. (2025). Gemini 2.5 Flash [Large language model]. https://gemini.google.com

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/

Perplexity AI. (2025). Perplexity [Large language model]. https://www.perplexity.ai/

I used Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic, 2025), a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, to generate a list of grammatical concepts that high school students should know by the end of the 12th grade.

I used ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2025) to edit my paper and provide feedback on clarity and flow.

Thus, when deemed useful for readers, prompts can be described in the text, but they are not included in the reference.

I provided the following prompt to Gemini (Google, 2025): “Please create an image of students in a classroom studying grammar concepts.” After reviewing the initial image created, I refined the images by adding more detail, asking Gemini to include more racial and ethnic diversity in the student population and specifying the age range should be adolescents.

We do not recommend treating the AI tool as an author.

cite a generative AI tool whenever you paraphrase, quote, or incorporate into your own work any content (whether text, image, data, or other) that was created by it

他们引用的生成段落：

Nature in Mansfield Park often mirrors the personalities or inner states of the characters. The different environments – Mansfield Park, Sotherton, and the wilderness at the parsonage – are symbolic of the moral choices and the values of the people who inhabit them.

正文中的转述：

In Mansfield Park, physical locations like Mansfield Park and Sotherton reflect the morality and choices of the people who live in them (“Describe the theme”).

正文中的直接引用：

Nature is depicted frequently throughout Mansfield Park, and it “often mirrors the personalities or inner states of the characters” (“Describe the theme”).

引用文献条目：

“Describe the theme of nature in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park” prompt. ChatGPT, model GPT-4o, OpenAI, 23 Sept. 2024, chatgpt.com/share/66f1b0a0-d704-8000-be9a-85f53c850607.

图题（DALL-E 3）：

Fig. 1. “Create an expressionist-style image of two people standing on a beach looking at the ocean” prompt, DALL-E, version 3, OpenAI, 23 Sept. 2024, chatgpt.com/share/66f1c3a3-3f90-8000-9750-82c57c4a6592.

有题诗：

“The Oak Tree” free verse poem. ChatGPT, model GPT-4o, OpenAI, 23 Sept. 2024, chatgpt.com/share/66f1c740-7500-8000-a38b-6d6045c811f5.

无题诗（以首行作题）：

“The autumn leaves fall softly to the ground . . .” sonnet about autumn. ChatGPT, model GPT-4o, OpenAI, 23 Sept. 2024, chatgpt.com/share/66f1ce9d-0b38-8000-a209-112496d3e0b1.

No. Google’s AI Overviews feature is a form of search results, and as we note in this post, “[s]earch results are not a work.”

If you want to cite something from the AI Overviews feature, click through to the source and cite it instead.

But generative AI output is not a source in the traditional sense.

Indicating where and how AI has touched your research and writing is just as much a part of academic integrity as citing your research sources is.

You do need to credit ChatGPT and similar tools whenever you use the text that they generate in your own work (in addition to acknowledging other uses of such tools).

But for most types of writing, you can simply name the AI tool in your text (e.g., “The following recipe for pizza dough was generated by ChatGPT”).

If you’ve edited the AI-generated text, you should say so in the text or at the end of the note (e.g., “edited for style and content”).

Like personal communications (see 14.111) and social media posts (see 14.106), chatbot conversations are not usually included in a bibliography or reference list.

正文中：

The following recipe for pizza dough was generated by ChatGPT.

提示已在正文中的注释：

1. Text generated by ChatGPT, OpenAI, January 10, 2026, URL.

承载提示的注释：

1. ChatGPT, response to “Explain how to make pizza dough from common household ingredients,” OpenAI, January 10, 2026, URL.

作者–日期括号：

(ChatGPT, January 10, 2026)

注释：

1. Text generated by ChatGPT, 出版者, 月 日, 年份, URL.

带提示的注释：

1. Response to “你的提示文本,” ChatGPT, 出版者, 月 日, 年份, URL.

书目（仅当网址公开时）：

出版者. Response to “你的提示文本.” ChatGPT. 月 日, 年份. URL.

Chatbots (such as ChatGPT) should not be listed as authors because they cannot be responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work, and these responsibilities are required for authorship (see Section II.A.1).

Referencing AI-generated material as the primary source is not acceptable.

• 教学大纲或期刊确实允许这种用法
• 每一句被引用或转述的生成句都已标记
• 功能性使用（编辑、翻译、构思）已披露
• 事实已对照已出版来源核对
• 没有把 Google AI Overview 当作来源
• 分享网址无需密码即可打开
• APA 以公司为作者；MLA 不编造作者
• Chicago 有注释或一句话，而不是沉默的书目行
• 期刊稿件在投稿信和正确章节中点名该工具