Affirmative Constructive
Public Forum · case outline
Resolution
To write: Paste the resolution exactly as it is worded.
Introduction and framing
- A.
[To write: Roadmap — name your contentions in the order you will present them.]
- B.
[To write: Framework (optional) — tell the judge how to weigh the round, or skip it if your impacts speak for themselves.]
Definitions
Tip: Cite where each definition comes from if the round could turn on it.
To write: Define the words in the resolution that the round could turn on.
Contention 1
Tip: Each contention runs claim, warrant, evidence, impact. Read the claim as a tagline, give the reason, cite the evidence, then say why it matters.
- A.
[To write: Claim — one sentence that says what is true.]
- B.
[To write: Warrant — the reason the claim is true.]
- C.
[To write: Evidence — add at least one cited source, one per line.]
- D.
[To write: Impact — what follows, how large, how likely, and how soon; and why it outweighs the other side.]
Contention 2
- A.
[To write: Claim — one sentence that says what is true.]
- B.
[To write: Warrant — the reason the claim is true.]
- C.
[To write: Evidence — add at least one cited source, one per line.]
- D.
[To write: Impact — what follows, how large, how likely, and how soon; and why it outweighs the other side.]
Prepared rebuttal blocks
Tip: Signpost every answer — “They say …, we respond …” — so the judge can follow it on the flow.
Block 1
- •
[To write: Fill in this part of the block.]
- •
[To write: Fill in this part of the block.]
- •
[To write: Fill in this part of the block.]
- •
[To write: Fill in this part of the block.]
Conclusion: voting issues
To write: Voting issues — one sentence each on why the judge should vote for you.